O paradoxo da conectividade: explorando o impacto da internet pública em parques urbanos como espaços de refúgio
Article Sidebar
Publicado
dic 8, 2025
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##
https://doi.org/10.36677/elperiplo.v0i50.26208
Main Article Content
Edgar Romario Aranibar Ramos
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5926-8544
Miguel Angel Demetrio Olarte Pacco
http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0303-7545
Emerson Marcos Serra Paurá
http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1102-9154
Reinaldo Miranda Sá Teles
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5096-7760
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5926-8544
Miguel Angel Demetrio Olarte Pacco
http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0303-7545
Emerson Marcos Serra Paurá
http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1102-9154
Reinaldo Miranda Sá Teles
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5096-7760
Resumen
Os parques urbanos, tradicionalmente reconhecidos como refúgios de tranquilidade, enfrentam desafios na era digital devido à crescente integração de tecnologias, como a internet pública. Este estudo qualitativo, exploratório e descritivo, analisou a percepção de centennials sobre o impacto da conectividade digital nesses espaços. Com base em entrevistas estruturadas realizadas com 57 respondentes, os resultados evidenciaram um paradoxo: enquanto a conectividade facilita interações sociais e acesso a informações, também interfere na experiência de desconexão e contemplação plena oferecida pelos parques. A inclusão digital foi valorizada, especialmente por frequentadores que dependem da internet para comunicação ou emergências. No entanto, os entrevistados ressaltaram que a presença constante de dispositivos móveis pode reduzir o potencial restaurador dos ambientes naturais. Como alternativas, sugeriram a criação de zonas específicas para o uso de internet, campanhas educativas sobre os benefícios da desconexão e regulamentação do uso de dispositivos digitais para preservar a serenidade. Conclui-se que a gestão de parques urbanos no contexto das cidades inteligentes deve equilibrar inovação tecnológica e bem-estar ambiental. Políticas públicas que promovam conectividade sustentável podem ampliar a inclusão digital sem comprometer a função restauradora desses espaços, garantindo sua relevância para as gerações conectadas.
Palavras-chave:
TParques urbanos. Conectividade digital. Centennials. Cidades inteligentes. ODS 11.7 – Cidades e Comunidades Sustentáveis
Article Details
Como citar
ARANIBAR RAMOS, Edgar Romario et al.
O paradoxo da conectividade: explorando o impacto da internet pública em parques urbanos como espaços de refúgio.
El Periplo Sustentable, [S.l.], n. 49, p. 80 - 97, dic. 2025.
ISSN 1870-9036.
Disponible en: <https://rperiplo.uaemex.mx/article/view/26208>. Fecha de acceso: 10 ago. 2026
doi: https://doi.org/10.36677/elperiplo.v0i50.26208.
Sección
Artículos de investigación
Quienes publican en El Periplo Sustentable están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- -Los (las) autores (as) conservan sus derechos de autor de forma plena y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación de su obra, la cual estará protegida de forma simultánea bajo la Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0), que permite a otros compartir, copiar y adaptar el artículo con un reconocimiento de la autoría y su publicación inicial en esta revista, así como no se use con fines comerciales.
- -Los (las) autores (as) pueden establecer por separado acuerdos contractuales adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional, temático o publicarlo en un libro), siempre con el debido reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
- -Se permite y se anima a los (las) autores (as) a difundir sus trabajos electrónicamente (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales, redes académicas o en su propio sitio web) una vez publicados. Esta acción promueve el intercambio científico, así como una citación más temprana y un mayor impacto de los trabajos publicados.
- -Los (las) autores (as) no pueden alterar, transformar o ampliar el documento final una vez que este ha sido publicado de forma definitiva por la revista.
- -El formato de Declaración de Autoría y Autorización de Publicación se encuentra disponible en formato PDF en la sección de criterios de publicación (dar clic aquí para abrir). Les solicitamos descargarlo, completarlo con sus datos, firmarlo y cargarlo en la sección de archivos complementarios dentro de este sistema.
El Periplo Sustentable por la Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
Creado a partir de la obra en https://rperiplo.uaemex.mx
Citas
Abdelhamid, M. M. (2019). Revitalization of historical urban parks using a smart approach. Journal of Engineering Research, 164, 20–35. https://doi.org/10.21608/ERJ.2019.123878
Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/
Arana, A. R. A., & Xavier, F. B. (2017). Qualidade ambiental e promoção de saúde: O que determina a realização de atividades físicas em parques urbanos? Geosul, 32(63), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-5230.2017v32n63p179
Batista, E. C., de Matos, L. A. L., & Nascimento, A. B. (2017). A entrevista como técnica de investigação na pesquisa qualitativa. Revista Interdisciplinar Científica Aplicada, 11(3), 23–38. https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/rica/article/view/17910
Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G., & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481–518. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cheng, Y., Zhang, J., Wei, W., & Zhao, B. (2021). Effects of urban parks on residents’ expressed happiness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Landscape and Urban Planning, 212, 104118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104118
Chu, Y.-T., Li, D., & Chang, P.-J. (2021). Effects of urban park quality, environmental perception, and leisure activity on well-being among the older population. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11402. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111402
Cruz-Zúñiga, N., Centeno Mora, E., & Barrantes Chaves, K. (2023). Citizen perception of security and visitation of public spaces: An exploratory study on regional public parks in Costa Rica. Revista Geográfica de América Central, 71, 161–192. https://doi.org/10.15359/rgac.71-2.6
Da, T., Li, Y., & Kondolf, G. M. (2023). Research on social connectivity of urban waterfront park based on place attachment. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 47(6), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202212019
Dye, M., Nemer, D., Pina, L. R., Sambasivan, N., Bruckman, A. S., & Kumar, N. (2017). Locating the Internet in the Parks of Havana. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3867–3878. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.302572
Efe, A. (2024). Um guia completo para a análise temática. Forms.app. https://forms.app/pt/blog/analise-tematica
Fontelles, M. J., Simões, M. G., Farias, S. H., & Fontelles, R. G. S. (2009). Metodologia da pesquisa científica: Diretrizes para a elaboração de um protocolo de pesquisa / Scientific research methodology: Guidelines for elaboration of a research protocol. LILACS-Express. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/lil-588477
Geng, D., Innes, J., Wu, W., & Wang, G. (2021). Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on urban park visitation: A global analysis. Journal of Forestry Research, 32(2), 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-020-01249-w
González, F. E. (2020). Reflexões sobre alguns conceitos da pesquisa qualitativa. Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa, 8(17), 155–183. https://doi.org/10.33361/RPQ.2020.v.8.n.17.322
Hampton, K. N., & Gupta, N. (2008). Community and social interaction in the wireless city: Wi-Fi use in public and semi-public spaces. New Media & Society, 10(6), 831–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808096247
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1989-98477-000
Kim, K., Lee, C. K., & Kim, H. W. (2022). Understanding the accessibility of urban parks and connectivity of green spaces in single-person household distribution: Case study of Incheon, South Korea. Land, 11(9), 1441. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091441
Long, Y., Qin, J., Wu, Y., & Wang, K. (2023). Analysis of urban park accessibility based on space syntax: Take the urban area of Changsha City as an example. Land, 12(5), 1061. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12051061
Maniruzzaman, K. M., Alqahtany, A., Abou-Korin, A., & Al-Shihri, F. S. (2021). An analysis of residents' satisfaction with attributes of urban parks in Dammam city, Saudi Arabia. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(3), 3365–3374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.11.020
Menconi, M. E., Tasso, S., Santinelli, M., & Grohmann, D. (2020). A card game to renew urban parks: Face-to-face and online approach for the inclusive involvement of local community. Evaluation and Program Planning, 79, 101741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101741
Mohammadi, F., & Ujang, N. (2022). Engaging in social interaction: Relationships between the accessibility of path structure and intensity of passive social interaction in urban parks. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 16(1), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-04-2021-0100
Moreno, M. (2019). Teoría de sistemas sociales e historia: Un acercamiento interdisciplinario para la investigación científica. Relaciones. Estudios de Historia y Sociedad, 40(159), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.24901/rehs.v40i159.425
Munaretto, L. F., Corrêa, H. L., & Carneiro da Cunha, J. A. (2013). Um estudo sobre as características do método Delphi e de grupo focal, como técnicas na obtenção de dados em pesquisas exploratórias. Revista de Administração Da UFSM, 6(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.5902/198346596243
Parra-Saldívar, A., Abades, S., Celis-Diez, J. L., & Gelcich, S. (2020). Exploring perceived well-being from urban parks: Insights from a megacity in Latin America. Sustainability, 12(18), 7586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187586
Paydar, M., Kamani Fard, A., & Gárate Navarrete, V. (2023). Design characteristics, visual qualities, and walking behavior in an urban park setting. Land, 12(10), 1838. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12101838
Plunz, R. A., Zhou, Y., Carrasco Vintimilla, M. I., McKeown, K., Yu, T., Uguccioni, L., & Sutto, M. P. (2019). Twitter sentiment in New York City parks as measure of well-being. Landscape and Urban Planning, 189, 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.024
Rapuano, M., Ruotolo, F., Ruggiero, G., Masullo, M., Maffei, L., Galderisi, A., Palmieri, A., & Iachini, T. (2022). Spaces for relaxing, spaces for recharging: How parks affect people's emotions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 81, 101809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101809
Samus, A., Freeman, C., Van Heezik, Y., Krumme, K., & Dickinson, K. J. M. (2022). How do urban green spaces increase well-being? The role of perceived wildness and nature connectedness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 82, 101850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101850
Sastoque, M. J. M. (2005). Contradicción, complementariedad e hibridación en las relaciones entre lo rural y lo urbano. Revista Mad. Revista del Magíster en Análisis Sistémico Aplicado a la Sociedad, (13), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5354/rmad.v0i13.14675
Schnell, I., Harel, N., & Mishori, D. (2019). The benefits of discrete visits in urban parks. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 41, 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.019
Stępniewska, M. (2021). The capacity of urban parks for providing regulating and cultural ecosystem services versus their social perception. Land Use Policy, 111, 105778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105778
Sugahara, N., & Takahashi, M. (2020). Exploring urban park use intention for a sustainable society from the posts on the social network. IEEJ Transactions on Electronics, Information and Systems, 140(10), 1165–1170. https://doi.org/10.1541/ieejeiss.140.1165
Talal, M. L., & Santelmann, M. V. (2021). Visitor access, use, and desired improvements in urban parks. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 63, 127216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127216
Tu, X., Huang, G., Wu, J., & Guo, X. (2020). How do travel distance and park size influence urban park visits? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 52, 126689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126689
Van Dinter, M., Kools, M., Dane, G., Weijs-Perrée, M., Chamilothori, K., Van Leeuwen, E., Borgers, A., & Van den Berg, P. (2022). Urban green parks for long-term subjective well-being: Empirical relationships between personal characteristics, park characteristics, park use, sense of place, and satisfaction with life in The Netherlands. Sustainability, 14(9), 4911. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14094911
Van Vliet, E., Dane, G., Weijs-Perrée, M., Van Leeuwen, E., Van Dinter, M., Van den Berg, P., Borgers, A., & Chamilothori, K. (2021). The influence of urban park attributes on user preferences: Evaluation of virtual parks in an online stated-choice experiment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010212
Volenec, Z. M., Abraham, J. O., Becker, A. D., & Dobson, A. P. (2021). Public parks and the pandemic: How park usage has been affected by COVID-19 policies. PLoS ONE, 16(5), e0251799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251799
Wan, C., Shen, G. Q., & Choi, S. (2021). Eliciting users’ preferences and values in urban parks: Evidence from analysing social media data from Hong Kong. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 62, 127172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127172
Wei, D., Wang, Y., Liu, M., & Lu, Y. (2024). User-generated content may increase urban park use: Evidence from multisource social media data. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 51(4), 971–986. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083231210412
Woo, J. H., & Choi, H. (2022). A trade-off method through connectivity analysis applied for sustainable design and planning of large urban parks. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 29(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2021.1931982
Xiong, Y., & Li, S. (2022). Can the establishment of university science and technology parks promote urban innovation? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(17), 10707. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710707
Zhang, J., & Tan, P. Y. (2019). Demand for parks and perceived accessibility as key determinants of urban park use behavior. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 44, 126420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126420
Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/
Arana, A. R. A., & Xavier, F. B. (2017). Qualidade ambiental e promoção de saúde: O que determina a realização de atividades físicas em parques urbanos? Geosul, 32(63), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-5230.2017v32n63p179
Batista, E. C., de Matos, L. A. L., & Nascimento, A. B. (2017). A entrevista como técnica de investigação na pesquisa qualitativa. Revista Interdisciplinar Científica Aplicada, 11(3), 23–38. https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/rica/article/view/17910
Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G., & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481–518. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cheng, Y., Zhang, J., Wei, W., & Zhao, B. (2021). Effects of urban parks on residents’ expressed happiness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Landscape and Urban Planning, 212, 104118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104118
Chu, Y.-T., Li, D., & Chang, P.-J. (2021). Effects of urban park quality, environmental perception, and leisure activity on well-being among the older population. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11402. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111402
Cruz-Zúñiga, N., Centeno Mora, E., & Barrantes Chaves, K. (2023). Citizen perception of security and visitation of public spaces: An exploratory study on regional public parks in Costa Rica. Revista Geográfica de América Central, 71, 161–192. https://doi.org/10.15359/rgac.71-2.6
Da, T., Li, Y., & Kondolf, G. M. (2023). Research on social connectivity of urban waterfront park based on place attachment. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 47(6), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202212019
Dye, M., Nemer, D., Pina, L. R., Sambasivan, N., Bruckman, A. S., & Kumar, N. (2017). Locating the Internet in the Parks of Havana. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3867–3878. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.302572
Efe, A. (2024). Um guia completo para a análise temática. Forms.app. https://forms.app/pt/blog/analise-tematica
Fontelles, M. J., Simões, M. G., Farias, S. H., & Fontelles, R. G. S. (2009). Metodologia da pesquisa científica: Diretrizes para a elaboração de um protocolo de pesquisa / Scientific research methodology: Guidelines for elaboration of a research protocol. LILACS-Express. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/lil-588477
Geng, D., Innes, J., Wu, W., & Wang, G. (2021). Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on urban park visitation: A global analysis. Journal of Forestry Research, 32(2), 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-020-01249-w
González, F. E. (2020). Reflexões sobre alguns conceitos da pesquisa qualitativa. Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa, 8(17), 155–183. https://doi.org/10.33361/RPQ.2020.v.8.n.17.322
Hampton, K. N., & Gupta, N. (2008). Community and social interaction in the wireless city: Wi-Fi use in public and semi-public spaces. New Media & Society, 10(6), 831–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808096247
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1989-98477-000
Kim, K., Lee, C. K., & Kim, H. W. (2022). Understanding the accessibility of urban parks and connectivity of green spaces in single-person household distribution: Case study of Incheon, South Korea. Land, 11(9), 1441. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091441
Long, Y., Qin, J., Wu, Y., & Wang, K. (2023). Analysis of urban park accessibility based on space syntax: Take the urban area of Changsha City as an example. Land, 12(5), 1061. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12051061
Maniruzzaman, K. M., Alqahtany, A., Abou-Korin, A., & Al-Shihri, F. S. (2021). An analysis of residents' satisfaction with attributes of urban parks in Dammam city, Saudi Arabia. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(3), 3365–3374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.11.020
Menconi, M. E., Tasso, S., Santinelli, M., & Grohmann, D. (2020). A card game to renew urban parks: Face-to-face and online approach for the inclusive involvement of local community. Evaluation and Program Planning, 79, 101741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101741
Mohammadi, F., & Ujang, N. (2022). Engaging in social interaction: Relationships between the accessibility of path structure and intensity of passive social interaction in urban parks. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 16(1), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-04-2021-0100
Moreno, M. (2019). Teoría de sistemas sociales e historia: Un acercamiento interdisciplinario para la investigación científica. Relaciones. Estudios de Historia y Sociedad, 40(159), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.24901/rehs.v40i159.425
Munaretto, L. F., Corrêa, H. L., & Carneiro da Cunha, J. A. (2013). Um estudo sobre as características do método Delphi e de grupo focal, como técnicas na obtenção de dados em pesquisas exploratórias. Revista de Administração Da UFSM, 6(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.5902/198346596243
Parra-Saldívar, A., Abades, S., Celis-Diez, J. L., & Gelcich, S. (2020). Exploring perceived well-being from urban parks: Insights from a megacity in Latin America. Sustainability, 12(18), 7586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187586
Paydar, M., Kamani Fard, A., & Gárate Navarrete, V. (2023). Design characteristics, visual qualities, and walking behavior in an urban park setting. Land, 12(10), 1838. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12101838
Plunz, R. A., Zhou, Y., Carrasco Vintimilla, M. I., McKeown, K., Yu, T., Uguccioni, L., & Sutto, M. P. (2019). Twitter sentiment in New York City parks as measure of well-being. Landscape and Urban Planning, 189, 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.024
Rapuano, M., Ruotolo, F., Ruggiero, G., Masullo, M., Maffei, L., Galderisi, A., Palmieri, A., & Iachini, T. (2022). Spaces for relaxing, spaces for recharging: How parks affect people's emotions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 81, 101809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101809
Samus, A., Freeman, C., Van Heezik, Y., Krumme, K., & Dickinson, K. J. M. (2022). How do urban green spaces increase well-being? The role of perceived wildness and nature connectedness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 82, 101850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101850
Sastoque, M. J. M. (2005). Contradicción, complementariedad e hibridación en las relaciones entre lo rural y lo urbano. Revista Mad. Revista del Magíster en Análisis Sistémico Aplicado a la Sociedad, (13), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5354/rmad.v0i13.14675
Schnell, I., Harel, N., & Mishori, D. (2019). The benefits of discrete visits in urban parks. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 41, 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.019
Stępniewska, M. (2021). The capacity of urban parks for providing regulating and cultural ecosystem services versus their social perception. Land Use Policy, 111, 105778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105778
Sugahara, N., & Takahashi, M. (2020). Exploring urban park use intention for a sustainable society from the posts on the social network. IEEJ Transactions on Electronics, Information and Systems, 140(10), 1165–1170. https://doi.org/10.1541/ieejeiss.140.1165
Talal, M. L., & Santelmann, M. V. (2021). Visitor access, use, and desired improvements in urban parks. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 63, 127216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127216
Tu, X., Huang, G., Wu, J., & Guo, X. (2020). How do travel distance and park size influence urban park visits? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 52, 126689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126689
Van Dinter, M., Kools, M., Dane, G., Weijs-Perrée, M., Chamilothori, K., Van Leeuwen, E., Borgers, A., & Van den Berg, P. (2022). Urban green parks for long-term subjective well-being: Empirical relationships between personal characteristics, park characteristics, park use, sense of place, and satisfaction with life in The Netherlands. Sustainability, 14(9), 4911. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14094911
Van Vliet, E., Dane, G., Weijs-Perrée, M., Van Leeuwen, E., Van Dinter, M., Van den Berg, P., Borgers, A., & Chamilothori, K. (2021). The influence of urban park attributes on user preferences: Evaluation of virtual parks in an online stated-choice experiment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010212
Volenec, Z. M., Abraham, J. O., Becker, A. D., & Dobson, A. P. (2021). Public parks and the pandemic: How park usage has been affected by COVID-19 policies. PLoS ONE, 16(5), e0251799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251799
Wan, C., Shen, G. Q., & Choi, S. (2021). Eliciting users’ preferences and values in urban parks: Evidence from analysing social media data from Hong Kong. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 62, 127172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127172
Wei, D., Wang, Y., Liu, M., & Lu, Y. (2024). User-generated content may increase urban park use: Evidence from multisource social media data. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 51(4), 971–986. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083231210412
Woo, J. H., & Choi, H. (2022). A trade-off method through connectivity analysis applied for sustainable design and planning of large urban parks. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 29(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2021.1931982
Xiong, Y., & Li, S. (2022). Can the establishment of university science and technology parks promote urban innovation? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(17), 10707. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710707
Zhang, J., & Tan, P. Y. (2019). Demand for parks and perceived accessibility as key determinants of urban park use behavior. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 44, 126420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126420